A Strategy for Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Shigeru Hirabayashi, et al. |
[Purpose]To determine a strategy for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. [Patients and Methods]Eighteen patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent decompression and spinal fusion only at the L4/L5 level using a pedicle screw system, from 1998 to 2002(13 females, 5 males, ages 46-77, average 64.6 years old, follow-up 1y-5y2m, average 2y8m). Spinal instability was defined as a difference of kyphotic angle between flexion and extension on functional X-ray view of 5 degrees or more. [Results]In 13 patients, olisthesis was reduced, and this was followed by PLF in 10 patients and PLIF in 3. Five patients had preoperative instability. In 2 who underwent reduction and PLF, L5 pedicle screws were broken. In one patient who underwent PLF in situ and 2 who underwent reduction and PLIF, no pedicle screws were broken. In one patient without instability who underwent reduction and PLF, L5 pedicle screws were broken. There was a tendency for pain and/or numbness in the lower extremities to remain in patients who underwent reduction of olisthesis.
The ratio of bony union was 83.3%. [Conclusion]To determine a strategy for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, it is important to evaluate preoperative instability at the olisthesis level. In patients with instability, olisthesis is reduced, and this is followed by PLIF. In patients without instability, olisthesis is not reduced, but PLF is preformed |
|