Main Theme 3: My Own Invention for Instrumentation |
Reduction with SRI for Spondylolisthesis
Yurito UEDA, et al. |
[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to evaluate the advantages of using the SOCON system and SRI(Spondylolisthesis Reduction Instrument) to reduce lumbar spinal spondylolisthesis.
[Materials and method] We reduced spondylolisthesis by the SRI and SOCON System in 40 cases(men 13, women 27 cases), and did not reduce but fused by other instrumentation systems in 11 cases(men 2, women 9 cases). We evaluated the preoperative and postoperative %slip, slip angle, and JOA score of the two groups.
[Result] Preoperative %slip of the reduction group was 22.5±1.4°and of the non-reduction group 23.9±4.4°. Postoperative %slip of the reduction group was 6.1±0.8°and of the non-reduction group was 12.7±3.3°. There were no significant difference between two groups in t-test preoperatively, but there was a significant difference (P=0.028) postoperatively. For slip angle and JOA score, there were no statistical significant differences between the two groups.
[Discussion] In the conventional reduction method, the slipped spine was pulled up only by the linear posterior force to the pedicle screw. Therefore it was difficult to reduce the lesions quantitatively, and there was a higher possibility of a screw avulsion, because they needed strong orthodontic force. The SRI used a link mechanism expertly, adding a distraction force, and then introfuding a reduction force in a cycloid pattern. Also the SOCON System with SRI could materialize the quantitative reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
[Conclusion] Reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis was certainly provided by the use of SRI and SOCON System, but there was no statistical difference in clinical result between the reduced and non-reduced groups, and this needs further examination. |
|