Comparison of Implants for Percutaneous Spine Fixation
Koji SATO, et al.
|
[Purpose] Implants for which we could insert a pedicle screw and a rod percutaneously are available for use in Japan. We found an opportunity to use three systems of SEXTANT, Xia precision, PathFinder. We compare the implant which can be used for less invasive lumbar spine intervertebral fixation(following MIS-PLIF) and review it.
[Subject] We did MIS-PLIF in 152 cases for LSCS since 2003. Of these, 100 cases in which we used both pedicle screws(following PS) include SEXTANT 94 cases, XIA 4 cases, and PathFinder 2 cases.
[Methods] We decompress by unilateral approach. For the group of SEXTANT, we use M8CD-HORIZON Pedicle Screw(following PS) and pre-bend rod using Telamon-MIS through an X-tube. For the group of Xia-MIS, we use Xia precision+Kobashi system PS and a straight rod and OIC through LUXOR. For PathFinder, we use PS and rod, and a Fidji cage through an Xtube.
[Results] Among 20 examples of the SEXTANT group, average operation time was 92.1 min, bleeding 76.8 g; among the XIA-MIS group, 113.5 min, 77.5 g; Among the PathFinder group, 84 min, 70 g. There were no differences.
[Conclusion] It is important that we know and use each characteristic, the directions for use, and other matters that require attention. |
|